Dentalcompare.com
  » Journal Updates

Early Treatment for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with the Twin-Block Appliance: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial

5/11/2009

Journal: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Citation: Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages 573-579 (May 2009)

Authors: Kevin O'Brien, Jean Wright, Frances Conboy, Priscilla Appelbe, Linda Davies, Ivan Connolly, Laura Mitchell, Simon Littlewood, Nicola Mandall, David Lewis, Jonathan Sandler, Mark Hammond, Stephen Chadwick, Julian O'Neill, Catherine McDade, Mojtaba Oskouei, Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Michael Read, Stephen Robinson, David Birnie, Alison Murray, Iain Shaw, Nigel Harradine, Helen Worthington
Introduction:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance for the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. This was a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial with subjects from 14 orthodontic clinics in the United Kingdom.

Methods:The study included 174 children aged 8 to 10 years with Class II Division 1 malocclusion; they were randomly allocated to receive treatment with a Twin-block appliance or to an initially untreated control group. The subjects were then followed until all orthodontic treatment was completed. Final skeletal pattern, number of attendances, duration of orthodontic treatment, extraction rate, cost of treatment, and the child's self-concept were considered.

Results:At the end of the 10-year study, 141 patients either completed treatment or accepted their occlusion. Data analysis showed that there was no differences between those who received early Twin-block treatment and those who had 1 course of treatment in adolescence with respect to skeletal pattern, extraction rate, and self-esteem. Those who had early treatment had more attendances, received treatment for longer times, and incurred more costs than the adolescent treatment group. They also had significantly poorer final dental occlusion.

Conclusions:Twin-block treatment when a child is 8 to 9 years old has no advantages over treatment started at an average age of 12.4 years. However, the cost of early treatment to the patient in terms of attendances and length of appliance wear is increased.

» Full Abstract

advertisement
Advertisement
Dental Office Setup
Learning Centers
New Dental Products
Biolase Laser Dealer/Supplier Network from Advanced Laser Source
More New Products...
Dental Newsletters
Stay up-to-date
Featured Review
Clearfil SE Protect: A Review
Clearfil SE Protect: A Review
More Reviews...
Featured Quick Pick
Dental Chairs
Dental Chairs
More Quick Picks...
Advertisement

Visit our sister sites

  • Searching for preclinical, clinical, or pharmaceutical development products and services?
    Drugdevcompare.com